Tuesday, December 22, 2009
- Host another sex party. The last one was great - all friends, very comfortable situation, and some very hot sex. I've got more friends interested, but they're up and down the state. I'm aiming for 4-5 couples. This one is totally doable.
- Broach the subject. I think I have more friends who would be totally comfortable knowing more about my lifestyle, and I'm not a huge fan about keeping this kind of secret. I'd like to let more friends know the basics, and they can inquire more if they're interested.
- See you naked. Well, again. It's been a while.
- Meet more swingers. I'd like to meet at least one other couple in person with the girlfriend (most likely from AFF) and see if we're a good match. We've had good luck with two of the three we've met in the past, so it's worth trying again.
- Masturbate more. My numbers were way down in 2009, for a variety of reasons. I started to pick it up in 3Q, but it wasn't enough to give me a year-over-year increase over 2008. I have high hopes for 2010.
- Have a mutually-agreed upon one-night stand. Friend or semi-stranger, either one is good.
I'm sure there are more, and I'll talk about them once I think of them.
What are yours?
Friday, December 4, 2009
I'm not one to require a good reason to do something sexual, but I've found that most popular sex acts (and lots of less popular ones) have a good reason behind them. Is the point of fisting simply to do it because you can? To see if your whole hand (and some of your arm) fits? Is the fist used to thrust like a giant cock? Or more like an anal toy that's placed to provide pleasure through stretching? I've never seen it done in real life, so I'm honestly curious. Your insights are welcome.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
I think the next group sex event will be in Vegas, if only because it's as central as anywhere else, and hotel suites are plentiful. I wish inviting all the people I'd like there wasn't made awkward by some of those people's past associations with each other. Such is life.
I need to start a support group (or social group?) for swingers who happen to have kids. I'm having trouble coming up with a name, however, that won't get me weird looks or accusations of unsavory intentions.
Anyone have any good advice for broaching the subject of swinging with friends? I always feel like I'm gonna come off like a pervert for bringing up the subject, but waiting for the right "in" usually means never talking about it at all.
That's all for today. Thanks for reading! Thanks more for commenting and adding your own thoughts to mine! =D
Monday, November 30, 2009
I like to think of sexual preference as a spectrum, with people at all different points. I also happen to think that the desire for a relationship with someone is not intrinsically connected to their desire to have sex with someone - I can imagine (and could likely enjoy) bisexual play in the right group situation, but I have absolutely no desire for a romantic relationship with a man. Thoughts?
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
I talked about this in a twitter post today, but I'm finding myself jealous of women because they have more body parts that men (and women) are curious to see. A titty flash has a unique place in our culture of being a bit "naughty" without necessarily being sexual: it can simply be revealing.
There are sexual connotations, of course, often related to the free-spiritedness or relative sexual openness of the flasher, but unlike a male cock flash (or cock picture), the message isn't "here is what I fuck with", but instead "here's a peek!" I'm not sure there's anything equivalent for men, especially anything that doesn't scream "I'm showing off hoping to attract you as a mate!" - I'm thinking anything shirtless showing off muscles, or the like.
There's probably a lot of baggage here tied in with objectified female sexuality and repression, and there is certainly a double standard in most places regarding having to covering up. But from an exhibitionist's point of view, I'm at a loss for how (or what) to show off that doesn't jump immediately into "overtly sexual" territory. There's a visual progression of flirting that comes with clothing removal for women that just doesn't seem to have a male equivalent. It's weird, and I'm jealous - I just wanna show something off.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Many of these things are simply language constructs: terms retain meanings through time, so "fooling around" doesn't mean you're doing anything bad, it's just the language we use to refer to something that may have been "foolish" a few generations back. But I think too often, people honestly feel like they have to be "bad" to enjoy themselves, whether it's having good sex or eating good food.
Is that healthy? I dunno. I prefer being open and honest with myself, and think it's a better approach to life. I think the real harm comes in actually feeling bad or guilty afterward, then having to deal with those feelings, and starting all over again when the urge to "sin" comes back. I think feeling good about everything you do is a good way to live your life. Then again, most people aren't hedonists...
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
If you know how to ask Google Reader who, specifically, is subscribing to a feed, let me know. It's part ego stroking and part technological interest. Really.
So, yeah, sex. It's good. No new partners lately, but there's a couple we'll likely meet in the next few weeks to see if we click. All this is tough when you're a parent - finding babysitting is decidingly unsexy. I'm also missing my old "chat about sex, or other things, just randomly 'cause we're both online" chat partners. I was flush with such friends a few years ago, but now most don't find their way online much. Always on the lookout for new ones.
Thanks for reading, everyone! It's nice writing again.
Friday, October 23, 2009
I'd put the following list of activities in "tier three" - tier one being very vanilla sex, tier two being the standard array of activities (multiple positions, oral sex, etc), and tier three being the next level ("kinky" by many standards). Rate (or rank, or re-order) the following from "kinkiest" to "least kinky", by any definition you adhere to:
Anal play (fingers or toys)
Cum swapping ("snowballing")
Group play (3-6 participants)
Light (no lasting pain) bondage play
Feel free to note if these activities are common for you, or occasional, and whether you give or receive (if applicable). Also feel free to note any other activities you think fit in my fairly arbitrary tier system (or let me know if you think it's totally off base). Be as specific or general as you like, and as anonymous or open as you like. This is all for my own curiosity/gratification - I look forward to your responses!
(For those curious, my "fourth tier" would involved what I consider to be more extreme sexual activities, including Master/Slave situations, fisting, piss sex, more extreme BDSM, etc. If anything above belongs in the third tier, or vise versa, voice that as well!)
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
A) Women secretly wish they could be more open and sexual all the time, and Halloween is a "safe" time to pursue it and act it out.
B) Women see "sluts" as something worthy of a Halloween costume, and dress up because the "costume" is weird/funny/different.
C) Horny men own all the costume companies, and force women into a narrow range of choices.
D) It's just what's popular.
Also: Is "slut" a bad word? Does it depend on context (and who's calling you one)? I don't like the connotation it usually has, but it's quite descriptive.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
August has been absurdly busy, and is full of other people's parties. While fun, I'd like to throw one of my own. However, I have to do it this Saturday night, or wait another month, given the calendar. I think I can do it.
Nothing new swing or orgy-wise, other than a few new connections online. The aforementioned business has made finding a spare weekend night to meet these folks difficult. Meeting and getting to know another couple seems like a lot of work right now, honestly, but a lazy hedonist is an unfulfilled hedonist. Unless you're really, really into being lazy...
I'm moving all my readers from my various other accounts here, so hopefully we'll get some traction. I love you all, but I always like more readers/commenters.
I need to find a bay area babysitter if my hope for an orgy up there (where a large concentration of my open friends live) is gonna happen. Either that, or just fly in for one night, which seems annoying as well.
What's new with you, my readers? Feel free to chime in with topics, questions, comments and observation. I work best when stimulated. Don't we all?
Monday, July 20, 2009
So, yeah, orgy.
It was pretty awesome. Three couples, lots of naked fun, and quite a few "first times" with various things, especially for the ladies. Everyone really enjoyed themselves (as should be the case), and while four couples would have been better, three was still great.
All that said, my sex blogging and now sex party experience is teaching me quite a bit about what I like, what I want, and what I can do without and still be happy. A voyeur at heart, I love to watch. I like to see people pleasured, I like to see them try new things, and I just like to watch sex - it's hot, of course, but it's also interesting. In some ways, it's more interesting when I'm done with being aroused (usually after I've finished) - it's primal, and mechanical, and truly an interesting use of the body.
All the watching, of course, is only good to a certainly point - you go to an orgy for the sex. I like the variety offered, being able to touch and grope around, have a little of this and a little of that. The interesting people arrangements (MF, MFF, MFMF, etc.) are great as well - involving more people in the act is still very novel to me. We actually didn't do a whole lot of that this party - there were pairings, and often one or more people on either end of the pairing, but not for long, and not as the primary action. But there's always next time.
I think the most interesting thing for me was that this party really helped to solidify what I'm not looking for, both in group sex and one-on-one sex. In a group, I don't want to be tied down (figuratively, at least) - I want to sample the offerings. I want to jump from one person to the next, maybe 15-20 minutes at a time with breaks in between. I don't want to be with one person most or all of the time - it makes me feel like I'm beholden to them, and solely responsible for their pleasure, when I've got other things, and other people, to do. Part of it is the "host" in me - I'm always moving around my regular parties, making sure everyone's having fun. The same goes for the orgy.
I'm also a huge fan of just making out/touching, even if it's not specifically part of having sex. Is that weird?
Logistically, this thing was as tough to plan as I thought it would be - weird schedules, hotel plans, travel - all made it annoying. After any sort of party I'm usually ready for a break from having to plan the next. But it was certainly worth it, and I'll likely have another before long. But it'll be in Northern California - almost everyone who'd be interesting in coming lives up there. I'm looking forward to it, so I must have done something right the last time.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Now, women - I dunno. I know a lot of sex-positive women who freely and openly discuss their masturbation habits, and some of them think that a similar (95%) amount of all women masturbate. In my small-yet-detailed sample set of friends, however, quite a few do not masturbate, and quite a few others do it very, very rarely. Some, of course, do it all the time, and that's fine. That's better than fine, actually.
Based on my life experiences, I'd put it like this:
% men who masturbate at all: 98%
% men who masturbate regularly (once a week): 85%
% men who masturabte daily, when possible: 70-80%
% women who masturbate at all: 75%
% women who masturbate regularly (once a week): 60%
% women who masturabte daily, when possible: 35-40%
So, my question: Ladies, do most other ladies masturbate? Do you? Regularly? Do your men? Do my numbers jive with what you've seen in your life? I haven't looked at any studies/polls/surveys, but I'm curious what the word on the street is.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Oh, there's a reason.
In a very unsexual 15 minutes, I went from having nature's most primal ability to having a 2cm incision, a numb scrotum, and what the government likes to call a "sterilization procedure" - a vasectomy. Some surprises:
- It really didn't hurt. There was tugging at first, and the needle-less anesthesia felt like repeated rubber band snaps, but once that was all happening, there was a dude slicing into my sack, and I really couldn't feel it.
- It took 15 minutes. Start to finish. Pants off to pants on. It was all done in a regular exam room, and the only special equipment was the cauterizer. I was able to walk out and go home right afterward.
- Recovery was quick. I was a little afraid of swelling and bleeding (the common risks), but there wasn't much of either. I had my first orgasm about 36 hours after the procedure, and all went well.
I'm 8 days out, now, and everything's pretty much back to normal. The boys do seem to be sitting differently, but that might be my imagination. Orgasms feel exactly the same, and so far, my cum has the same consistency. It does take a while to clean out the pipes, but it's not supposed to change. I do wish the doctor would have told me that bruising and discoloration commonly doesn't start until day 5 and lasts a while, but that's mostly gone now too. A dozen or so more orgasms, and I'll be ready for unprotected, full blast, balls out good times.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
- Hotel room secured. I'm not sure if I just keep looking at business hotels without a lot of weekend traffic, or if the economy is sucking harder than I realized, but I got a two-bedroom, two-bathroom, two-level suite for $140, on a Friday night. I'm surprised, but happy about that situation.
- Babysitting secured. This was more difficult than I imagined, for a variety of reasons. Someday, I'll do a post about the trials and tribulations of parents trying to be swingers.
- Six, possibly eight, attendees secured. This was by far the hardest part of the whole thing - getting quarum. Us and one other couple would have been fun, but not an orgy. Now that it's at least three couples (and possibly four), it gives everyone a chance to try more things, but more importantly, it gives everyone the ability to sit things out without feeling like they're depriving anyone else.
There's still some stuff left to do - getting a confirmation (either way) from couple number four, deciding on food (I'm thinking cheese and fruit, drinks, sweet snacks, and maybe something else - thoughts?), and buying sex supplies (no one wants to run out of condoms, lube, or towels during a party). But overall, it's all coming together, and hopefully Friday, we'll all be coming together!
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Case in point: A woman in Florida is busted for arranging sex with porn stars and models. Men were paying between $8,000 and $50,000 for introductions and arranged meetings -- that's a lot of scratch. Maybe it's just me, but I'd think any guy who can throw around that amount of money could probably get some pretty top-shelf pussy just by putting himself out there. Fine, maybe he's married, or a pillar of virtue in his community: but don't you think it's easier to say "that random bitch is lying" than to explain away your name in a madam's book?
What gets me is that Charlie Sheen is thought to be one of her clients. Charlie Sheen: rich, pretty good looking, and popular. Already known for liking the ladies, and not minding paying for them. But I can't imagine the dude can't go the rock star route and have a "handler" find groupies who'd be more than willing to give it up for free. Dude's already got a reputation as a lady's man, it's not like getting caught with a random girl is going to hurt him (especially any more than getting caught with a pro).
I realize there's a place in our society for prostitution, and I think it should be safe and legal. I just think there are way too many men paying for sex that could easily get it for free.
Monday, May 4, 2009
My question: How much do you tell your doctor? Do you have one that knows if you're a swinger, or poly, or just very active? Do you phrase questions in generalities insted of implying/admitting you do them yourself? Do you think it's important to tell them, either way?
Thursday, April 30, 2009
We've never had sex with them, for good reason - it's the wife's best friend and her husband. Not exactly "off limits", but still kinda weird. So assuming there are more attendees than just the four of us, it's good (the wife wants to be able to keep her distance from the best friend, at least while the action is happening - harder to do if there aren't more people there).
Couple number two is interested, but we're waiting to see if they can make it down (we have a lot of people from Northern California on our "to do" list, but the party's down here). Our local friends are still a "maybe" - I don't want to bug them, but it'd be nice to get planning.
I'll be talking to couple number four soon, and while I'm sure they're interested, I'm not sure they're available. Still considering whether it's gonna be all couples or some singles too - guess it depends on who can make it. But so far, so good! If everyone's a "yes", that's 12 people, pretty awesome. That's not even counting any friends-of-friends who may get invited.
If you're reading this, and I know you, and you're interested, let me know!
Friday, April 24, 2009
So it's on me.
As always, scheduling is the biggest bitch with these things, and most everything else other than the female/male ratio just secondary. I'm going to write up the process, both for others interested in doing such a thing, and to motivate me (both in writing, and in planning). Here's what I'm thinking, as of today, anyway:
- Couples-mostly party. My single lady friends will be welcome too. Luckily for me, there really aren't any single guys I'd have to tell "no, sorry dude" to.
- At LEAST a 50/50 ratio of men to women, preferably with one or two extra women.
- June, before it gets too hot. Hot and naked is fun, sweating when you're not even doing anything? Not so much.
- Mostly people I know. Close friends-of-friends are great, but I'm not going to open it up to strangers (so get to know me now).
- 8-12 people total. That gives everyone both the option to do a lot of things/people, and the option to check out without feeling like they're depriving someone else.
I'm not sure yet on location. My house is definitely easiest and big enough, but there are logistical issues as well. A hotel could work, but we'd need a pretty awesome suite with at least 3 beds -still, it's doable.
Any advice or suggestions are welcome - I've tried planning a few of these before, but scheduling issues have always gotten in the way. I think the first step is find out when the norcalers can make it down, and plan accordingly. More updates soon!
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
While I decide this periodically, I've decided again that it's time for a larger (8-12 people) sex party. Well, maybe a "sexy party" - not everyone has to have sex there if they don't want - but at least a party where it's encouraged and provided for. There's actually more interest this time, assuming we find a date that works for everyone (always an issue). It doesn't help that half the likely attendees are in northern California, but hey, what can you do?
Updates to come!
Monday, March 23, 2009
So here we are.
I envision a world where we can talk about sex and pleasure and good times without the social weirdness that goes along with it. But I'm as guilty as anyone else - most of what's stopping me is that I say things that I just want some people to see.
This of course, brings up another question - what about the people who don't know about this side of me, but I'd like for them to? For the most part, these are women I'm interested in, but that don't know I'm a swinger. I worry that while they're my friends, they're really not that interested in my sex life (hell, I have plenty of friends whose sex lifes are entirely unappealing/uninteresting to me). I don't want to totally change our relationship dynamic for the worst, but fear that may be the risk if I'd like it to change for the sexy.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Yeah, that's been me.
I have the regular set of excuses, too - tired, busy, Daylight Saving Time, whatever. I thought I should write something down, though.
So here I am.
The normal pleasures of life - most namely good food and good sex - have been replaced with the drive for good sleep. This too will pass: 7am won't feel like 6am by next week, and I won't be suddenly awake when I should be going to bed. None of this will replace the "busy" excuse, but it'll help, I'm sure.
Speaking of busy, the wife and I aren't making the most of our Adult Friend Finder membership. I don't think we're the only people with grand intentions of meeting new people, only to forget to login, reply to email, or generally socialize with those we could eventually meet. Does this happen to you? If you're on AFF too, let me know - it's a nice place to share pics, etc. without the total openness of even this anonymous blog. Either way, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
Friday, February 27, 2009
First, Hedonism: Life is pleasure. By some definitions, pleasure is the only thing that matters in life, and is the only thing which is "good". The term is widely thrown around, but usually has the above elements as central.
Ethical Hedonism still holds that pleasure is a defining goal in life, but puts the stipulation that it can't harm others. For example, most of us would agree that sex is quite pleasurable and is a standard hedonistic pursuit. The ethical hedonist, however, woudln't just do it whenever he or she wanted, or with whomever he or she wanted - considerations would have to be made for spouses, other primary relationships (of both/all partners) and the potential for harm.
Simply? You shouldn't fuck someone if you don't have permission from your (and their) other partners, unless they've got that agreement. If you're lying, cheating or could potentially hurt someone with your actions, then your actions probably don't fit under the "ethical" umbrella.
For the most part, we all live this way. People will often do stupid things that hurt someone else, but I've met very few honestly bad, hurtful people in my time (this could be because anyone like that wouldn't stay connected to me long). People who do stupid things or make bad choices aren't usually bad - they just fucked up.
Ultiamtely, ethics are decided by the individual, and we're all different. What's "harmful" to me might be matter-of-fact to you - and that's fine. But generally, people can appreciate the societial norms of the social groups they're in, and know what's considered "right" and what's not. Play by the rules, and you're probably doing alright.
If you're reading here, I have a feeling you're already an ethical hedonist.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
We'll see what this blog becomes - until there's some content, feel free to make suggestions. For a variety of reasons, I'm going to remain name-anonymous here (meaning that you could probably figure out who I am if you read enough, but I'm not gonna spell it out for you), but you're free to be whoever you like. And just because I won't use my name doesn't mean I won't be totally honest - that's kinda the point here, isn't it?
At the moment, I'm hoping for lots of little updates, essays on ethical hedonism, all sorts of frank sexual discussion, and a host of other things. If you're a twitter user, please follow me at http://twitter.com/OCHedonist. It's what inspired me to actually start a new blog. Thanks for reading, and enjoy!